Maybe I’m way off on this, but the phrase “marriage
equality” just makes me sad.
It is sad to hear about young Catholics refusing to receive
the Sacrament of Confirmation because the Church is “against gay
marriage.” It is also sad to hear about
Catholic high school student marching in protest because their school won’t
allow a faculty member to continue teaching after being married to a person
of the same sex. It is so sad that this
issue has become a wedge between parents and children, grandparents and
grandchildren.
As the debate is most commonly framed, it seems that people have only two alternatives: either support marriage equality, or be a bigot. After all, who could possibly be against equality? But are the congressional leaders working to amend the Constitution--as well as the U.S. Bishops and countless lay faithful who support this cause--really bigots? Or do they just disagree with the notion that marriage can be redefined and still mean anything substantive?
There may, indeed, be some bigots out there, but how can we help advocates for marriage equality see that a third group really exists? That is, how can we help them understand that the vast majority of people who support traditional marriage are fellow brothers and sisters who are not against them, but for them?
Here are a few initial thoughts on the key terms in question:
·
Marriage:
The
difference is the difference. Male
and female we were created; male and female is how the human race is
propagated. Marriage either is something—the
fundamental human community which bonds a man and a woman together for the sake
of raising children who have a mother and a father—or it is nothing at
all. In other words, if the sexual
difference is removed by judges or legislators, then an entirely new reality is
created. Therefore, it is not that
proponents of traditional marriage are against
anyone who advocates gay marriage; rather, they are for the protection of this totally unique reality.